Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 NW2D 926 - State v. Pickering

State v. Pickering’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
September 1993
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 63 Mich. App. 706 - People v. Karasek · State v. Kafka · State v. Oien · State v. Crofutt · Ellis v. Archer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Where a request has been made to charge the jury on a lesser-included offense, the duty of the trial judge is determined by the evidence. If evidence has been presented which would support a conviction of a lesser charge, refusal to give the requested instruction would be reversible error. (citations omitted) There must be sufficient evidence, however, when read in the light most favorable to the defendant, which would justify a jury in concluding that the greater offense was not committed and that a lesser offense was, in fact, committed." 264 N.W.2d at 706 , quoting People v. Karasek, 63 Mich.App. 706 , 234 N.W.2d 761 (1975).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Any person who intentionally causes serious public inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm to any other person, or creates a risk thereof by: (1) Engaging in fighting or in violent or threatening behavior [ ] is guilty of disorderly conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.