State v. Farmer’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is not true as a categorical statement of the law because it does not take full account of the requirement of ORAP 5.45(2) as interpreted in State v. Brown , 310 Or. 347 , 355, 800 P.2d 259 (1990), that the error of law must be 'apparent,' meaning 'obvious, not reasonably in dispute'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that may be addressed without an objection to the sentencing court.'). State v. Farmer , 317 Or. 220 , 224 n. 4, 856 P.2d 623 (1993) (so qualifying Cook ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.