Huffman and Wright Logging Co. v. Wade’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
6 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2015
6 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o law shall be passed restraining any of the inhabitants of the State from assembling together in a peaceable manner to consult for their common good; nor from instructing their Representatives; nor from applying to the Legislature for redress of greviances [ sic ].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"nothing in Article I, section 26, suggests that that right [to assemble peaceably] includes a right to disrupt possession of the private property of another, at least when, as here, the private property is not open to public use."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"No law shall be passed restraining the free expression of opinion, or restricting the right to speak, write, or print freely on any subject whatever; but every person shall be responsible for the abuse of this right."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.