Mannix v. Keisling’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1996
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(6) To avoid confusion, a ballot title shall not resemble any title previously filed for a measure to be submitted at that election.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(d) A concise and impartial statement of not more than 85 words summarizing the measure and its major effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.