Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 P.2d 273 - Lumm v. Colliard

Lumm v. Colliard’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1964
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cassidy v. Gould · Indian Land & Trust Co. v. Owen · Noble v. Kahn · FIRST NAT. BANK OF BETHANY v. Eagan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' “Where evidence in case of equitable cognizance is conflicting, trial court’s finding thereon will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly against the weight thereof.” Mayer v. Pettigrew, Okl., 272 P.2d 411 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.