Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 S.C. 102 - State v. Sarvis

State v. Sarvis’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2018

11 state decisions

40199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Amperex Electronic Corp. v. New York Racing Assn., Inc. · State v. Livingston · State v. Hill · State v. Johnson · Horton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “program [referenced on that page of the document] and no further foundation was presented to establish the manner in which the records were prepared.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he requirements of the statute were not satisfied[;] therefore[,] the document was properly excluded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act ... contains prerequisites to admission of the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.