State v. Cason’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
January 2003
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rosales-Lopez v. United States · Ham v. South Carolina · Ristaino v. Ross · Turner v. Murray · Robinson v. Howell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was offensive, it did not inextricably inject race into the trial and was used to show the defendants state of mind, not that race was a motive for the crime). ¶ 44. In Cason , the South Carolina Supreme Court analyzed the testimony of the defendant's use of a racial epithet in describing the murder victim, not in the context of admissibility but rather in the context of jury voir dire to ameliorate any undue prejudice. Id. That Court reasoned that a specific voir dire question designed to reveal racial prejudices on the part of the juror is required only when a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.