Ulbrich v. Ulbrich’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1987
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 312 So. 2d 726 - Finn v. Finn · Aldrich v. Aldrich · Bunn v. Bunn · 283 So. 2d 342 - First National Bank of St. Petersburg v. Ford · 313 So. 2d 458 - Rouse v. Rouse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We find no error in the requirement that child support continue until the child reaches 18 years of age or finishes high school, whichever is later. However, on remand, we think the provision should be amended to provide that said obligation does not extend beyond the child's 21st birthday (absent of course mental or physical deficiencies rendering him unable to support himself) in accordance with Finn v. Finn ... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.