Adkins v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
September 2002
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 239 So. 2d 17 - Coggan v. Coggan · 52 So. 2d 115 - Potter v. Garrett · Bird v. Bird · 270 So. 2d 434 - Seesholts v. Beers · 119 So. 2d 811 - Taylor v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In cases like this there frequently exists an aura of hostility and awkwardness not necessarily common to co-tenancy of lands or other properties held for commercial purposes. While neither of the parties contended that he or she was ousted from possession, it is unrealistic to believe that parties who could not get along living together while they were married would be expected to enjoy common usage of the former marital home after their divorce.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Where a wife, as cotenant, is granted exclusive possession of the marital residence via a divorce decree and later seeks partition of it, can the husband, as an excluded cotenant, recover or setoff the reasonable rental value of the property during the period of his exclusion, where the wife, as tenant in possession, seeks to recover advances made for mortgage, insurance and tax payments and repairs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.