Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

317 So. 2d 780

Burlingham v. Allen

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1975-08-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1983

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1975-08-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BOYER, Chief Judge.

¶1Appellee Grusmark moved for a summary judgment, whereupon appellant sought to have the court consider, in passing upon the appellee’s motion for summary judgment, certain depositions taken in another case to which appellee was not a party. Appellee received no notice of the taking of the depositions in the other case, was not present, was not represented and had no opportunity to cross examine the deponent. In considering a motion for summary judgment the trial judge is authorized to consider only those things and matters authorized by Rule 1.510 RCP. He was eminently correct in refusing to consider the above mentioned depositions which were never even filed in the case sub judice.

¶2Finding the other points raised by appellant to be without merit, the summary judgment here appealed is

¶3Affirmed.

McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.
/317/so2d/780 · .json · Public domain