Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 SW2D 796 - Lindsey v. Stuart

Lindsey v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1983
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cowden v. Cowden · Martin v. Robinson, 67 Tex. 368 (Tex. 1887) · Tevis v. Armstrong · Boyd v. Hogue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We, ourselves, construe the cases as meaning that where a suit to recover two or more separate tracts of land that are situated in different counties is brought in the county in which one of the tracts is situated venue as to all of the tracts of land lies in the county of suit, provided that the parties to the suit are the same with reference to each and all of the tracts and that as between the parties themselves the same facts are determinative of title to each and all of the tracts. And it is by this standard that we shall appraise the record that is before us.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.