Shellabarger v. Shellabarger’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp. · Kludt v. Connett · Shelton v. Williamson · M & P Enterprises, Inc. v. Transamerica Financial Services · Cross v. Drury Inns, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. A trial court grants or denies summary judgment based on facts established by the summary judgment motion and responses thereto; “our review is confined to the same facts and does not extend to the entire record before the trial court.” 3 2. Facts come into a summary judgment record only per Rule 74.04(c)(1) and (2), “that is, in the form of a pleading containing sepa rately numbered paragraphs and a response addressed to those numbered paragraphs.” 4”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.