Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

317 S.W.3d 99

State v. Gray

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 2010

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2010-05-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2012

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-05-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Quintín Gray (Defendant) appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, following his conviction by a jury, of unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of Section 571.030, RSMo (2000). Defendant was sentenced, as a prior offender, to four years of imprisonment. Finding no manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice, we affirm.

¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

¶4 We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/317/sw3d/99 · .json · Public domain