Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 U.S. 178 - Mangus v. Miller

Mangus v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

317 U.S. 178 · 1942

Citation profile

118
cited by 118 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 118 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2016 · most notably Davies Warehouse Co. v. Bowles (1944), Wragg v. Federal Land Bank (1943)

52 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

45019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedMiller v. Mangus (from Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110

Relies on Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. · Kalb v. Feuerstein · Kalb v. Feuerstein · Wright v. Union Central Life Insurance · John Hancock Mut Life Ins Co v. Bartels

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 118 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it would be an appropriate exercise of the court’s jurisdiction to take suitable measures to remove those difficulties by affording the interested parties opportunity to assert their rights in the state courts and, when they are ascertained and defined, by administering the debtor’s interest as the Act provides, so far as may be found practicable. Id., at 185 , 63 S.Ct. at 185 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.