Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 318 ARK 688 - Jones v. McCool

Jones v. McCool’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1996
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Porchia v. State · Markham v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nearly a month after the appellee State filed its brief, appellant filed a motion seeking to amend the brief to include an abstract. The motion is denied. Once the appellee has filed its brief, it is too late to file a motion to amend the appellant's brief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.