Ramirez v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
318 F.2d 155 · 1963
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably United States v. S. Lawrence Kahn, Arthur B. Sachs and M. Prial Curran (1967), United States v. Mann (1975)
39 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 656 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Russell v. United States · Hagner v. United States · Hartman v. United States · United States v. Britton · Benchwick v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The revised section without changing in any way the meaning or substance of existing law, clarifies, condenses, and combines related provisions largely rewritten in matters of style.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the words 'did wilfully misapply' constitute a sufficient charge of a criminal intent to defraud.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“might be an act of maladministration on the part of the defendant. It might show neglect of official duty, indifference to the interests of the association or breach of trust, and subject the defendant to the severest censure and to removal from office; but to call it a criminal misapplication by him of the moneys and funds of the association would be to stretch the words of this highly penal statute beyond all reasonable limits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.