Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 318 F.2d 518 - Garvin v. American Motor Sales Corp.

Garvin v. American Motor Sales Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

318 F.2d 518 · 1963

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
June 2013
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably Edward C. Rea and 22 Ford Inc., a Corporation v. Ford Motor Company, a Corporation (1974), Autowest, Inc. v. Peugeot, Inc. (1970)

23 federal appellate · 5 district ·

240196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woodard v. General Motors Corp. · Milos v. Ford Motor Co. · Staten Island Motors, Inc. v. American Motors Sales Corp. · Leach v. Ford Motor Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “§ 1222. Authorization of suits against manufacturers; amount of recovery; defenses "An automobile dealer may bring suit against any automobile manufacturer * * * and shall recover the damages by him sustained and the cost of suit by reason of the failure of said automobile manufacturer * * * to act in good faith in performing or complying with any of the terms or provisions of the franchise, or in terminating, canceling, or not renewing the franchise with said dealer * * *.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““the duty of each party to any franchise, and all officers, employees, or agents thereof to act in a fair and equitable manner toward each other so as to guarantee the one party freedom from coercion, intimidation, or threats of coercion or intimidation from the other party: Provided, That recommendation, endorsement, exposition, persuasion, urging or argument shall not be deemed to constitute a lack of good faith.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(T)he statute does not require the manufacturer to aid in financing the operations of its dealers.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.