Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 318 F.3d 785 - United States v. Two Eagle

United States v. Two Eagle’s Empirical Analysis

318 F.3d 785 · 2003

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably United States v. Gregg (2006), United States v. Ziesman (2005)

23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

230200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 113 · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 1365 (Federal Anti-Tampering Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Costello v. United States · Wood v. Georgia · United States v. Hearst · Feguer v. United States · United States v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) a substantial risk of death; (B) extreme physical pain; (C) protracted and obvious disfigurement; or, (D) protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not objectionable because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A]n expert, as distinguished from a lay witness, may express his opinion on the ultimate jury question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.