Irvis v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2281
Relies on Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority · Shelley v. Kraemer · Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia · Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · United States v. Guest
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Nothing in what we here say implies a judgment on private clubs which limit participation to those of a shared religious affiliation or a mutual heritage in national origin. Such oases are not the same as the present one where discrimination is practiced solely on racial grounds and therefore collides head on against the ‘clear and central purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment * * * to eliminate all official state sources of invidious racial discrimination in the States.’ ’’ (Emphasis ours.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a)s in Burton the state has 'insinuated itself into a position of interdependence' with its club licensees . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(i)t would be difficult to find a more pervasive interaction of state authority with personal conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.