Quick v. Educap, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1342 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1257 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Foman v. Davis · Allen v. McCurry · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'litigation activities,' such as filing fraudulent documents or engaging in baseless litigation to serve as predicate acts for RICO ... where such acts constitute 'the only allegedly fraudulent conduct.' " Feld Entm't, Inc. v. Am. Soc'y for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals , 873 F.Supp.2d 288 , 318-19 (D.D.C. 2012), quoting Daddona v. Gaudio , 156 F.Supp.2d 153 , 162 (D. Conn. 2000) ; see also Quick v. EduCap, Inc. , 318 F.Supp.3d 121 , 141-42 (D.D.C. 2018) ("As Plaintiffs' RICO claim is premised entirely on mailings done for the purpose of litigation activity, they have failed to state a claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.