Danberg v. Langman’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1985
8 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Railway Company v. McCarthy · Bond v. Moore · Gibson v. Brown · Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Brubaker · Blair v. Vanblarcum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is a well settled rule that when one party to a contract refuses to perform and bases his refusal on one ground he waives all other grounds, or is estopped, when suit is brought, from setting up other grounds for his refusal. Gibson v. Brown, 214 Ill. 330 [ 73 N.E. 578 ]; Miller v. Gordon, 296 id. [Ill.] 346 [ 129 N.E. 809 ]; Vincent v. McElvain, 304 id. [Ill.] 160 [ 136 N.E. 502 ]; County of Schuyler v. Missouri Bridge Co., 256 id. [Ill.] 348 [ 100 N.E. 239 ]; Ohio and Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCarthy, 96 U.S. 258 [(6 Otto) 24 L.Ed. 693 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.