Arnold Developer, Inc. v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2 district · 44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Gross v. Sussex Inc. (1993), Williams v. Mayor of Baltimore (2000)
2 district · 44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on King v. Bankerd · DiGrazia v. COUNTY EXEC. FOR MONT. CTY. · Porter v. General Boiler Casing Co. · Fenwick Motor Co. v. Fenwick · Cloverfields Improvement Ass'n v. Seabreeze Properties, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Maryland Rule 2-501(e) provides that: The court shall enter judgment in favor of or against the moving party if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, and affidavits show that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the party in whose favor judgment is entered is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“All the assets and rights of the corporation, except those sold or those of which it was otherwise divested while the charter was void, are restored to the corporation to the same extent that they were held by the corporation before the expiration or forfeiture of the charter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.