Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 318 N.C. 663 - State v. Cotton

State v. Cotton’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

138
cited by 138 later decisions
4
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 136 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 138 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably State v. Coffey (1990), State v. Rose (1994)

2 federal appellate · 136 state decisions

6601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. McClain · State v. Mason · State v. Morgan · Henry v. Deen · State v. DeLeonardo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence that another committed the crime for which the defendant is charged generally is relevant and admissible as long as it does more than create an inference or conjecture in this regard. It must point directly to the guilt of the other party. Under Rule 401 such evidence must tend both to implicate another and be inconsistent with the guilt of the defendant.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake, entrapment or accident.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “been markedly liberal in admitting evidence of similar sex offenses by a defendant for the purposes now enumerated in Rule 404(b) . . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.