318 N.J. Super. 90 - Bless v. Bless’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2010
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brooklier v. United States · 32 Cal. 3d 689 - Kumar v. Superior Court · Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. · Neger v. Neger · E. E. B. v. D. A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is in the best interest of the child that a court of this State assume jurisdiction because (i) the child and his parents, or the child and at least one contestant, have a significant connection with this State, and there is available in this State substantial evidence concerning the child’s present or future care, protection, training, and personal relationships. [N.J.S.A. 2A:34-31(a)(2).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Meng“New Jersey has jurisdiction to make a child custody determination ... if: (1) This State (i) is the home state of the child at the time of commencement of the proceeding....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“custody and visitation shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of New Jersey.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.