Hickey v. Settlemier’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2018
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the party sought to be precluded has had a full and fair opportunity to be heard on that issue.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the issue in the two proceedings is identical.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Some statements are themselves evidence of significant legal facts; the substantive law attaches certain consequences to such utterances so that the mere making of the statement becomes an issue in the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.