Keahbone v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1986
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Wroth · 87 Okla. Crim. 313 - Lowrey v. State · People v. Knapp · 89 Okla. Crim. 294 - Ladd v. State · 5 Okla. Crim. 522 - Ridley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It will be observed that the language employed by the legislature in the foregoing statutes is not permissive, but mandatory, as follows: ‘They must require the officer to conduct them into court’, whether they seek information on the face of the record as to testimony, or seek information on a point of law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Badgwell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.