Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 318 P.3d 250 - State v. Mangum

State v. Mangum’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Workman · State v. Fedorowicz · State v. Hutchings · State v. Lucero · State v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there was no requirement to show specific intent in order to support [the defendant's] conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “was charged and convicted under subsection (1)(b)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “likely to produce death or serious bodily injury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.