Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 318 SO2D 186 - Bowman v. Bowman

Bowman v. Bowman’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
December 1982
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chamberlain v. Lesley · 286 So. 2d 218 - Holden v. City of Fort Lauderdale · Ramirez v. Ramirez · Brown v. Fine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think a moment’s reflection on the part of members of the profession will convince them that their duty to this court, their clients, and the state requires that in all cases here represented by them they should brief the questions involved on appeal, not only because it may aid to secure a just and correct decision of these questions, but because this court is thereby enabled to dispose of its business more rapidly than it otherwise could do.” Chamberlain v. Lesley, 39 Fla. 452, 456-457 , 22 So. 736 , 737 (1897).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “failure to file a brief not only places an undue burden upon the Appellate Court but additionally, reflects an omission of the responsibility on the part of the appellee to support the ruling of the trial court. If the trial court's ruling is not worthy of support then the appellee ought to confess error and to join the appellant in seeking a reversal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.