¶1 ORDER
¶2 Bedford Mitchell (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post- *309 conviction relief under Rule 24.035 after an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).