Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 318 SW3D 703 - State v. Osborn

State v. Osborn’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Dusky v. United States · Drope v. Missouri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the trial court erred by failing to conduct a hearing on the record to determine if I knowingly and intelligently waived my constitutional right to a jury trial, this violates my due process of law rights, guaranteed by the 6th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Sections 10 and 22(a) of the Missouri Constitution, and Mo.Sup. Ct.R.27.01(b). Because the trial court’s failure was per se prejudicial, this court must reverse and remand for a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “does not contain a requirement that a defendant know that his victim is under the age of fifteen,” the approved jury instruction pertinent to this charge, MAI 320.37, provides that,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.