Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

318 S.W.3d 787

State v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 2010

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2010-08-31

Relies on State v. Washington

Decided 2010-08-31

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 James A. Smith appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of possession of a controlled substance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no plain error. Rule 30.20; 1 *788 State v. Washington, 260 S.W.3d 875, 879 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

1

¶3 . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

/318/sw3d/787 · .json · Public domain