Schildhaus v. Moe’s Empirical Analysis
319 F.2d 587 · 1963
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 1994
12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barnett v. Jaspan · Abel v. Brayton Flying Service, Inc. · United States v. City of New York · Thompson v. Baltimore & Ohio R.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Were the question open for review we would be inclined to conclude that the district court's finding lacked support in the record * * *,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schildhaus v. Moe“The judgment is modified to eliminate the condition and as so modified it is affirmed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schildhaus v. Moe“Under these circumstances we may not review these findings of the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schildhaus v. Moe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.