Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 F.2d 717 - Bartley v. United States

Bartley v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

319 F.2d 717 · 1963

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
2
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently April 2003 · most notably Gregory v. United States (1966), Byrd v. United States (1965)

52 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

29019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on James Edwards, Jr. v. State of South Carolina · Cella v. United States · Wheeler v. United States · Mary Hill Valone v. John A. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(t)he rule requires 'an explicit admonition to the jury by the court at the time a prior inconsistent statement is admitted, and also an instruction at the close of trial, that the statement can be considered only as bearing on credibility.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the statement[s] may be considered only as bearing on credibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.