Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 F.3d 1153 - Peterson v. Lampert

Peterson v. Lampert’s Empirical Analysis

319 F.3d 1153 · 2003

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably Casey v. Moore (2004), Cook v. Schriro (2008)

33 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

690200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes · Picard v. Connor · Engle v. Isaac

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “made a deliberate, strategic choice not to present the federal issue in his petition.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “for purposes of exhaustion, a citation to a state case analyzing a federal constitutional issue serves the same purpose as a cite to a federal case analyzing such an issue.” In Peterson the claim was not fairly presented because the petitioner, rather than”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “assistance of counsel. Peterson could have fairly presented his federal claim in a number of ways, including (but not limited to) the ways just mentioned, but here he specifically and exclusively alleged a violation of his right to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.