Hartman v. Kickapoo Tribe Gaming Commission’s Empirical Analysis
319 F.3d 1230 · 2003
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 2710 (§ 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2714 (§ 15 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad Passengers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e adhere to `[a] frequently stated principle of statutory construction[:] when legislation expressly provides a particular remedy or remedies, courts should not expand the coverage of the statute to subsume other remedies.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.