Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 F.3d 225 - Whelan

Whelan’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Conley v. Gibson · United States v. Turkette · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “187. All JAC Enterprise Defendants are part of a “union or group of individuals associated in fact” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (4). 188. At all relevant times, Capwill controlled the JAC Enterprise and its affairs, either through direct personal control, or indirectly through entities he controlled, or indirectly through persons acting on his behalf, said persons inelud-ing but not being limited to Sandelier, Susan Eckstein Elam and Andrew Cap-will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a)a person who has received income from a pattern of racketeering activity cannot invest that income in an enterprise; (b) a person cannot acquire or maintain an interest in an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity; [and] (c) a person who is employed by or associated with an enterprise cannot conduct the affairs of the enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity!.]” 2”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.