In Re: Alphonso Michael Espy’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
July 2006
most recently cited
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Olson v. 86-1 · In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application) · In Re Oliver L. North (Bush Fee Application) · In re Sealed Case · Nofziger v. 87-1
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the requirements of the Act; and 4) the fees are”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“of the investigation; 2) the fees were incurred”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“without subjecting the petitioner to the conditions that led to his incurring the fees sought. In re Segal (Sagawa Fee Application), 151 F.3d 1085 , 1089 (D.C.Cir., Spec. Div., 1998) (per curiam) (quoting In re Nofziger, 925 F.2d at 438 ). 13 4. Not wholly distinct from category (3), supra, when”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.