Schmidheiny v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis
319 F.3d 581 · 2003
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2023
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1129
Relies on United States v. Johnson · Sweger v. Chesney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. at 583. The Third Circuit assumed that Weber's initial registration of schmidheiny.com was not covered by § 8131(1)(A) because it had been made before the passage of ACPA. See id. at 581-82. Based on that assumption, the Third Circuit was concerned that holding that re-registration was not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. GoPets Ltd. v. Hise“permit the domain names of living persons to be sold and purchased without the living persons' consent, ad infinitum, so long as the name was first registered before the effective date of the Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. GoPets Ltd. v. Hise“that the word `registration' includes a new contract at a different registrar and to a different registrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. GoPets Ltd. v. Hise
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.