United States v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis
319 F.3d 81 · 2002
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably United States v. Wright (2010), United States v. McGee (2009)
34 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3559 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 802 (§ 102 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Bass · United States v. Kozminski · United States v. Thomas · United States v. Wake · United States v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prior convictions for Criminal Sale of Marijuana in the Fourth Degree under New York law [are] 'aggravated felonies.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“). CONCLUSION The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED . 1 In 2011, the offense level for the drug conviction (Group 1) was 28 and the offense level for each of pharmacy burglaries (Groups 3, 4, and 5) was 19. Because the difference between the offense level for Group 1 and each of Groups 3, 4, and 5 was nine levels, no additional units were assigned to the pharmacy burglaries. See U.S.S.G. § 3D1.4(c) (In determining the combined offense level,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a drug trafficking offense is an “aggravated felony” [as defined by 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(B) ] when it is: (1) an offense punishable under the [Controlled Substances Act] CSA, and (2) can be classified as a felony under either state or federal law. See United States v. Pornes-Garcia, 171 F.3d 142, 145 (2d Cir.1999); United States v. Polanco, 29 F.3d 35, 38 (2d Cir.1994).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.