Burden-Meeks v. Welch’s Empirical Analysis
319 F.3d 897 · 2003
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Elrod v. Burns · United States v. Nixon · Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Cobbledick v. United States · Church of Scientology of California v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Knowing disclosure to a third party almost invariably surrenders the privilege with respect to the world at large; selective disclosure is not an option.”) (Easterbrook, J.). 8 . TAP persistently mischaracterizes the court's March 17 memorandum as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[h]iring lawyers to do consultants' work does not bring a privilege into play”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.