Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 F.3d 921 - American United Logistics Inc Central American Warehousing Co Inc v. Catellus Development Corporation

American United Logistics Inc Central American Warehousing Co Inc v. Catellus Development Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

319 F.3d 921 · 2003

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 91 Ill. 2d 69 - Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co. · 131 Ill. 2d 428 - Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc. · 176 Ill. 2d 179 - In Re Chicago Flood Litigation · 92 Ill. 2d 171 - Redarowicz v. Ohlendorf · Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the Federal Arbitration Act favors resolution of disputes through arbitration, its provisions are not to be construed so broadly as to include claims that were never intended for arbitration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “American United Logistics, Inc. v. Catellus Dev. Corp., 319 F.3d 921 , 929 (7th Cir.2003) (citing Harter v. Iowa Grain Co., 220 F.3d 544 , 549-50 (7th Cir.2000)).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We review the district court's ruling to compel arbitration de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.