Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 FSUPP 1237 - Reichenberger v. Warren

Reichenberger v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2013

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

6019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Roth v. United States · Zwickler v. Koota · Stanley v. Georgia · Propper v. Clark · 20 Wis. 2d 134 - McCauley v. Tropic of Cancer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Wisconsin Supreme Court has made it very clear that in construing the term ‘obscene’ as it appears in Wisconsin statutes, the Court will import the definition of obscenity approved by the Supreme Court of the United States in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 , 77 S.Ct. 1304 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1498 (1957), and in its subsequent decisions. It is reasonable to conclude that the Supreme Court of Wisconsin will respond in the same manner with respect to the term ‘indecently.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Whoever does any of the following may be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than one year in county jail or both: (2) Publicly and indecently exposes a sex organ.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.