Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 FSUPP 457 - Meyer v. Austin

Meyer v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 1975
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roth v. United States · Freedman v. Maryland · Near v. State of Minnesota Olson · Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers · Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"For the purposes of this section, the test of whether or not material is obscene is: Whether to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to prurient interest."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"A person who knowingly ... has in his possession custody or control with intent to sell ... any obscene ... magazine ... is guilty of a misdemeanor ..."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the material is utterly without redeeming social value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.