Shinall v. Worrell’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
8
states following
December 1985
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Pierson v. Ray · Roth v. United States · Leary v. United States · Stanley v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ (a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to intentionally disseminate obscenity in any public place. A person, firm or corporation disseminates obscenity within the meaning of this Article if he or it: * * * “ (3) Publishes, exhibits or otherwise makes available anything obscene; or “(4) Exhibits, broadcasts, televises, presents, rents, sells, delivers, or provides; or offers or agrees to exhibit, broadcast, televise, present, rent or to provide; any obscene still or motion picture, film, filmstrip, or projection slide, or sound recording, sound tape, or sound track, or any matter or material of whatever form which is a representation, embodiment, performance, or publication of the obscene. “(b) For purposes of this Article any material is obscene if: “ (1) The dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest in sex; and, “ (2) The material is patently offensive because it affronts contemporary national community standards relating to the description or representation of sexual matters; and, “(3) The material is utterly without redeeming social value; and, “(4) The material as used is not protected or privileged under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of North Carolina.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bryant““* * * three elements must coalesce: it must be established that (a) the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to a prurient interest in sex; (b) the material is patently offensive, because it affronts contemporary community standards relating to the description or representation of sexual matters, and (c) the material is utterly without redeeming social value.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gregory v. Gaffney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.