Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 FSUPP3D 974 - McCarty v. Menards

McCarty v. Menards’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · United States v. Morton Salt Co. · 136 Ill. 2d 132 - Ward v. K Mart Corp. · 198 Ill. 2d 541 - Simmons v. Garces

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A reasonable person in Mr. McCarty's position, who saw that there were signs, chose the stack he wanted by looking at the signs, walked right up to the signs, was working within a few feet of the protruding sign, and either repeatedly stepped over it or turned toward it, would have noticed the large sign and legs as a tripping hazard.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “A district court properly grants summary judgment where there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.