Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 GAAPP 640 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 277 Ga. App. 92 - Nelson v. State · Jordan v. State · 298 Ga. App. 545 - Brown v. State · 298 Ga. App. 52 - Hobby v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In particular, the intention with which an act is done is peculiarly for the finder of fact. It is often difficult to prove with direct evidence an individual’s intent as it existed at the time of the act for which he is being prosecuted. Thus, intent is often proved through the use of circumstantial evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.