Kaley v. Hulsman’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1960
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harpham v. Whitney · Glenn v. Lawrence · McElroy v. Catholic Press Co. · Farris v. Messimore · 248 Ill. App. 196 - Hanneman v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is also the rule that to support a case of malicious prosecution there must be both malice and want of probable cause, and these must concur. Glenn v. Lawrence, 280 Ill. 581, 587 . And malice may not be presumed from want of probable cause if all the evidence shows there was no malice. Hanneman v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co., 248 Ill. App. 196 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shelton v. Barry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.