Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 MASS 105 - Tupper v. Hancock

Tupper v. Hancock’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
4
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Federal Deposit Insurance v. Singh (1992), Itt Corporation v. Ltx Corporation (1991)

12 federal appellate · 2 district · 37 state decisions

13019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Shawmut Bank v. Joy · Willett v. Herrick · Radovsky v. Wexler · Barrell v. Britton · Gold v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a canon of construction that every word and phrase of an instrument is if possible to be given meaning, and none is to be rejected as surplusage if any other course is rationally possible.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Where, as here, the releases were absolute and unequivocal in their terms, they cannot be explained by parol evidence and must be construed according to the language the parties have seen fit to use.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.