Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 N.J. Super. 569 - State v. Halm

319 N.J. Super. 569 - State v. Halm’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Texas v. Brown · Sedillo v. United States · Johnson v. United States · State v. Bruzzese

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the prosecutor weighed the relevant and material factors and reached a conclusion that defendant was not an appropriate candidate for PTI.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “view the prosecutor's decision through the filter of the highly deferential standard of review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “seeking reconsideration of a decision denying a PTI application”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.