State v. Pinnell’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2019
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The defendant may demur to the accusatory instrument when it appears upon the face thereof: " * * * * * "(2) If the accusatory instrument is an indictment, that it does not substantially conform to the requirements of ORS 132.510 to 132.560 , 135.713, 135.715, 135.717 to 135.737, 135.740 and 135.743 [.]"”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Warren“The defendant may demur to the accusatory instrument when it appears upon the face thereof:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Warren“No State shall * * * pass any * * * ex post facto Law * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Montez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.